Thursday, September 29, 2005

Uke Gotta See This

Liam and I finished painting his "guitar" yesterday. It's actually a baritone ukulele. Here's a picture of the finished product:

Unfortunately, Liam didn't want to pose for a photo with it. But here's a very short recording I made last night of me playing a wee instrumental piece on the uke. It's an old parlor guitar tune called Spanish Fandango. (You may want to turn up your volume slightly as it's not a loud instrument.) Musicians may be interested to know I have the uke tuned to open G, so it's sort of like a nylon-string banjo without the drone string.

Here's a photo of Liam with the uke before the paint job, about a year and a half ago. It's the cover of the miniature CD of songs I recorded for Liam and his buddies:

Want more ukulele stuff? Here's a Robert Johnson song that I recorded using this same instrument: Love in Vain

And finally, here's a link to my favorite ukulele site on the Web: The Fourth Peg

Wednesday, September 28, 2005

Mixing it Up

I recently read an article in the New York Times marking the 50th anniversary of Vladmir Nabokov's "Lolita." The piece mentioned that he included a character in the novel named Vivian Darkbloom, which is an anagram of his own name.

This struck me as a cool idea, so I tried to figure out any good anagrams of my own name. Here are a few that I came up with for BILL ACKERBAUER:

Caleb Uke Briar

Buba Race Killer (ominous!)

Blu Balicker (that's just wrong)

Today I found a Web site that will automatically generate anagrams of any word, over at wordsmith.org. Here are some of the better ones it came up with for my name (strangely, they all seem appropriate):

A BABE LICK LURER

LIABLE RARE BUCK

A CLUBABLE KERR I

A KEBAB CURL LIER

A RABBLE LUCKIER

A RABBI ULCER ELK

CUBA BEAR KILLER

BAR ALK BE ULCER I

BAR LARK BLUE ICE

I'm tempted to try typing in GEORGE W BUSH ...






 

Tuesday, September 27, 2005

To Spank or Not to Spank

A war has been raging in my household of late, and in brazen defiance of all logic and probability, the larger, stronger, savvier, more experienced of the combatants is nearly always the loser.

I end up feeling like a loser, at least, every time I spank my three-year-old son.

Liam is an adorable, funny, playful, bright and loving kid, so it’s painful to describe our relationship in harsh terms, but lately he’s adopted pushing daddy over the edge as his favorite pastime. Some days it’s like having our own little Iraq insurgency right here at 9 Maplewood Avenue. The calm of each new day is shattered before 8 a.m. over such incendiary questions as whether Liam wants peanut butter or jelly on his toast. He is a master of the improvised explosive rhetorical device. It is crude but effective. A typical conversation:

"Liam, would you like toast for breakfast?"

"No toast. Cereal."

"Okay, how about Cheerios?"

"No Cheerios. Toast."

"Do you want peanut butter or jelly? Or both?"

"Peanut butter."

"Okay, it’ll be ready in a mi—"

"Jelly. Jelly. I want jelly jelly jelly want jelly … No jelly. Ice cream."

"Arrrrrggggg!!!"

All this before daddy has managed to slurp down his first cup of coffee. But before you take me for a short-fused brute who uses corporal punishment in response to typical finicky toddler behavior, let me assure you I set the bar much higher on offenses that call for spanking. While we are no Mr. and Mrs. Ghandi, my wife and I think of ourselves as fairly patient and progressive parents. We agree that spanking is the discipline of last resort, and we reserve it for times when Liam has or is about to put himself in danger (such as running into the street after being told not to), or when his behavior threatens another person’s safety. Unfortunately, he has little interest in safe, quiet or peaceful activities.

One day this week, for example, he attempted to find out how hard he could bite his baby brother’s finger before it came off, and he probably would have found out if I hadn’t been there to unclamp his jaws and deliver a whollop to his posterior. The next day he tried for a toe, but again he was pried loose and punished. This sort of thing happens a lot, but baby Carter is resilient, as all second children must be if they intend to survive to adulthood.

I feel obliged to acknowledge that there are echoes of my own childhood in Liam’s alarming and destructive exploits. The reign of terror I waged on my younger sister Nancy, circa 1975-1988, included an experiment in which I tested the hypothesis that I could keep her quiet for at least five minutes by sealing her lips together with Krazy Glue. The adhesive proved alarmingly effective, and Dad had to apply several substances before he found one capable of unsticking her lips. (I’ve since toyed with the idea of claiming trademark rights for a product I would call "Sanity Solvent," which I would market specifically to the two demographic groups most prone to trouble with Krazy Glue: construction workers and the parents of preadolescent boys.)

For my scientific endeavor I was punished not merely with standard spanking but with a vigorous paddling with the heftiest wooden spoon in Mom’s kitchen. Other offenses that earned me a painful tenderizing with it included shooting my sister with a BB gun. (The fact that it was a ricochet rather than a direct hit was not considered a mitigating factor because the object that deflected the BB was Dad’s car.) The spoon itself was the sort of long-handled utensil one imagines an old-world grandmother twirling inside a steaming pot of mouth-watering goodness of a Sunday afternoon. But that particular spoon and I had a long and bitter relationship, which I ended at age 11 by secretly burying it in the back yard.

Beating a child with a wooden spoon might seem a draconian punishment by today’s elevated standards, but growing up I was often reminded that the instruments of corporal punishment had been even crueler for previous generations. Behind the door to Dad’s office there used to hang a leather strap that his father had used to keep razors sharp and his four children in line. It was a weathered and obviously well-used piece of brown cowhide, about three inches wide and three feet long. Dad only had to explain its history to me once, and he never had to take it off its hook. From that point on he would merely arch an eyebrow and nod his head in the general direction of its resting place behind the office door.

Seeing that vicious strap of the ’40s and ’50s often made me wonder if the decision to use the spoon in the ’70s and ’80s was a natural progression toward gentler methods of discipline. If so, I’ve often wondered, what sort of medieval bludgeons must the pre-strap generations have been punished with? Burlap sacks filled with lead shot? Red-hot pokers? My ancestors were either verywell-behaved or deft at dodging blows, else I wouldn’t be around to speculate about them today.

In light of the weaponry employed by earlier generations, my empty-handed paddling of Liam's bottom seems a quantum leap forward in tolerant parenting. But the experts tell me I am not tolerant enough. One of the more popular reference volumes on the subject is What to Expect: The Toddler Years, which warns that "Spanking is humiliating and demeaning to both the parent and the child, often shattering self-esteem and morale." Most of the other books in the How To Be a Less Imperfect Parent section at Barnes & Noble seem to take the same position, offering such advice as "Consider a time-out," and "Let your child suffer the natural consequences of the crime." I have already established that spanking my toddler has a negative effect on my own self-esteem: I feel bad about it after I’ve done it, even when I can’t see any better means of preventing an injury or calling his attention to the fact that his behavior is dangerous. On the other hand, I’m pretty certain that being flattened by a truck in the middle of the street would also tend to put a damper on his self-esteem, not to mention the morale of the entire family.

I imagine these books are intended for an audience of parents from another species, let’s call them Homo Angelicus. They never lose their cool or suffer paralyzing pangs of terror upon seeing their children in life-threatening situations. They all raise confident, well-adjusted children with healthy attitudes and few insecurities. Their kids never need to be spanked and their morale is always sky-high, although some of the younger ones are missing a few fingers and toes.

Some Passing Thoughts

When I launched this blog back in May, I told myself I wouldn't let it get too bogged down in politics. I intended to limit the subject matter to items of a cultural, personal or creative nature. (Click here to read my first post on this blog.)

Lately, as you can tell from recent posts, I've started to stray from that apolitical path. One reason is that I've been writing a lot of essays and commentary for a course I'm taking at Albany, and the mental juices have been flowing more copiously than usual of late. Another reason is that quality writing requires quality thinking, and it's impossible to think too hard about the state of the world today and not start seeing the places where political and ideological matters intersect with the cultural and the personal.

But the problem with blogging more about politics is that it will tend to homogenize your audience: People who agree with your views will tend to keep reading for that happy carrot of positive reinforcement you provide, and if you're lucky you'll attract some new readers. People who disagree will drift away, though, toward some other reading material less offensive to their sensibilities.

I'm not promising that I will keep this blog absolutely ideology-free, because I have strong, informed views and they make up an essential part of who I am as a citizen, a parent, a student, a musician and a writer. But I want this blog to to be a big tent, as the saying goes, with room for all sorts of readers. I don't want to preach to the choir; I don't want to preach at all. I want this blog to be more like a traveling carnival or a vaudeville theatre than a soap-box.

Send in the juggling clowns and the fire-breathing poodles!

Losing our Religion

"According to the study, belief in and worship of God are not only unnecessary for a healthy society but may actually contribute to social problems."

Thanks to Hank Fox for the following link to this London Times story that by an odd coincidence is on a topic related to my last post:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1798944,00.html

 

Monday, September 26, 2005

Here We Go With Those Stone Tablets Again

I received a disturbing e-mail message today. You know, one of those mass-mailing, "pass it on" jobs. Here's an excerpt to give you an idea of what it was like:  

It is said that 86% of Americans believe in God. Therefore, it is very hard to understand why there is such a mess about having the Ten Commandments on display or "In God We Trust" on our money and having God in the Pledge of Allegiance. Why don't we just tell the other 14% to Sit Down and SHUT UP!!!  

 My response:  

 Hey, why don't we carve the Ten Commandments on every public building? And make school prayer mandatory, too! All those non-believers who think they're real Americans aren't feeling alienated enough already.  

While we're at it, why don't we go back to the good old days and make slavery legal? Heck, we could take away women's right to vote, too. We could start taking the commandments literally, and lock up all the Jews, Muslims, pagans and atheists. We could even arrest people for swearing!  

What makes the Constitution a great foundation for our country is not that it is based on the religious principles of the people who happened to establish it. It is great because it protects the rights of the minority to have a dissenting opinion and a voice, so that people with different views can express them without fear of being persecuted. It is great because it established a court system that is supposed to protect the rights of any citizen who comes before it seeking justice, regardless of his or her political and religious beliefs. It is great because the law can evolve along with the society it holds together.  

Love your neighbor, don't kill, don't steal, don't cheat on your spouse. Those are solid principles, and appropriate pillars of our system of government. But they are not exclusively Judeo-Christian principles. I don't know of any religion that isn't pure nonsense that doesn't hold them to be of central importance. But the world is too complicated a place to fit all the rules on two stone tablets, and they are not the law of this nation.  

Telling people to "sit down and shut up" is not going to make this country a better place. That's fascism, and it's ugly.  

By the way, I don't know why Andy Rooney's name and picture are on that message, because I've read that, like me, he is an agnostic. He did write the following, however (and you can look it up): "I don't differentiate much, except in degree, between people who believe in religion from those who believe in astrology, magic or the supernatural."  

I wish more people would focus on our current problems here and worldwide (wars, overpopulation, gross disparity in wealth, human rights abuses, limited resources going to waste) instead of railing against anything that challenges what certain powerful people wrote down as gospel or law 2,000 or 200 years ago. Think about all the things you thought you knew when you were a child or a teenager. Do you still believe them all? Don't you think it's possible that as a civilization it's time for us to grow up a little, too?  

Bill Ackerbauer

Johnstown, NY  

Follow-Up: Here is a link to an excellent analysis of the truth and lies contained in that e-mail message (the original text, not the plagiarized and fanaticized version falsely attributed to Andy Rooney):

http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/capital.asp

Thursday, September 22, 2005

A Haiku for My Wife on Her Birthday (which is today)

 

First day of Autumn

Sweetest of the year, plum-ripe

Savor it, hold on

Two New Recordings

This morning I recorded a couple of things. One is an original fiddle tune I named after Col. Elias Peissner, a German national who became a professor at Union College and a member of the Sigma Phi Society, which I joined about a century and a half later. He died at the head of the 119th New York Volunteers in the Battle of Chancellorsville.

Peissner's March to Glory (.mp3)

Elias Peissner

The other thing I managed to get recorded is a song I wrote last year. The melody is from an old song that Uncle Dave Macon and others have recorded. The lyrics, obviously, are autobiographical. Thanks to Sam Schneider for pointing out that I should explain what "The Line" is. Folks around here refer to the east-west rail/highway corridor that follows the Mohawk Valley as "The Line." So if you're headed from here toward Albany or Schenectady, you're going "down the line." I plan to dub a fiddle solo and maybe some other instrumental noodling to add some texture, but this is a raw take with just guitar and vocal. (Warning: this one is a 3.9MB download, so it will take several minutes via a dial-up connection.)

Workin' Down the Line (.mp3)  

Uncle Dave Macon

Tuesday, September 20, 2005

Familiar Topic Redux

This is an essay on the same subject as the one in the previous post. This one takes a more deliberate tack:

 

A Pamphlet That May or May Not Be Left
on the Windshield of a Patriotic Pickup

By Bill Ackerbauer      Sept. 20, 2005

   Howdy, neighbor. If you can spare a moment, I'd like to discuss the messages on the back of your vehicle. I understand you might get a chuckle out of that "Terrorist Hunting Permit" bumper-sticker, and your "Support Our Troops" magnet fills your heart with pride and purpose. But perhaps it hasn't occurred to you that these messages have an entirely different effect on many of the people who will see them as you drive around town. 

  I must concede the "Terrorist Hunting Permit," with its handgun logo, official-looking typography and semisubtle reference to the 9/11 attacks, is somewhat funny. The first time I saw it, I smiled at its cleverness before I realized the full range of its possible implications. Humor can hurt. "The secret source of Humor itself is not joy but sorrow," Mark Twain once wrote. I wouldn't put such a sticker on my car for the same reason I wouldn't tell a joke that plays off crude ethnic or sexual stereotypes. You might argue that the butt of your sticker's joke is some nameless, faceless jihadist, or perhaps Osama bin Laden himself, but other people — people who are not deserving of insult or disrespect —  will see your sticker and feel the painful twinge of alienation. 

   I'm reminded of a local Palestinian-American businessman who shortly after Sept. 11, 2001, was the victim of a brutal rumor that he had voiced sympathy with the perpetrators of the terrible attacks of that day. The xenophobic idiot who started that rumor, and nearly launched a boycott of the man's business before the word got out that the allegation was false, no doubt thought of himself on some level as a "terrorist hunter."   

   There is also the matter of your bumper sticker's indirect insult to the real terrorist hunters, the military personnel and other government operatives who have risked and lost their lives in the caves of Afghanistan and the streets of Iraq.

   Whether or not we agree theirmissions are righteous, we must acknowledge that thousands of Americans have killed and died motivated by the belief that they are defending your right to say whatever you believe, on the bumper of your pickup truck or anywhere else.

   This brings me to the subject of supporting our troops. The overwhelming majority of Americans do indeed support and respect the efforts and sacrifices of our soldiers, sailors and airmen, myself included. Although I share the basic sentiment, "Support Our Troops," I do not emblazon my car with the yellow ribbon because I do not agree with its subtext. For many people, the assumed tacit meaning of "Support Our Troops" is "Support the War in Iraq" or "Support Our President's Foreign Policy." Funny, you don't see those slogans on many people's cars and trucks.

   What does it say about our society that so many nowadays are expressing their fervent patriotism in the form of temporary magnets? Are motorists more concerned about their cars' trade-in values than voicing their own moral and cultural values? Are magnets preferred in case one has to make a quick change  in the event of a shift in general public opinion? With stickers, at least, one makes a minor commitment.

   As a progressive Democrat and an objector to the Iraq war, I feel like an outsider, and I feel marginalized by the slogans on your car. And I'm lucky. People can't tell where I come from or what I think just by looking at me or hearing my last name. I can't imagine how much more deeply the sting is felt by a person whose appearance or last name makes him stand out in this jingoistic crowd as a person who might harbor dissenting opinions. 

   Don't dismiss me as a member of some phantom liberal elite. I didn't swoop into your conservative-majority community from some far-away socialist republic like Vermont. I am proud to be a liberal; I am a progressive, tolerant, socially conscious, open-minded individual who thinks wars should not be waged for political or economic exploitation. My views put me slightly to the left of the country's mainstream on many issues, but I'm not a stranger. You and I live on the same street, we buy our groceries at the same store, and our kids attend the same schools.

   Sorry to take up so much of your time with this bit of commentary. My ideology cannot be summarized on a bumper sticker.

Monday, September 19, 2005

A Familiar Topic

My regular readers may recall that I wrote a blog entry on this subject back in August, but I've fleshed it out (it went from two paragraphs to two pages), so that now it's stronger, not merely an odd thought jotted down in a hurry ... 

A Terror-Free Neighborhood

By Bill Ackerbauer  Sept. 19, 2005

Folks around these parts take the security of their homeland very seriously. I am able to sleep soundly at night, secure in the knowledge that my wife and children are safe from evildoers, thanks to the impressive qualifications of certain rock-solid citizens who inhabit our neighborhood. Why, on this block alone, we have three licensed terrorist hunters, one of whom is quite proud to be Protected by Smith & Wesson, and two employees of a Jewish carpenter. And it goes without saying that everyone is Proud to Support Our Troops. It says so right on the back of their gargantuan Suburban Uh-ssault Vehicles.

The guy next door is as generous as he is vigilant. In addition to being one of our local anti-terror permit-holders (not Mr. Smith & Wesson), he must have included me in his will, because apparently I have permission to take his firearm in the event of his death. One never knows when one will be called on to take up the Colt M4A1 semi-automatic carbine and enter the fray — for home protection and what have you.

The third terrorist hunter on my block must use non-lethal methods such as nets or tranquilizer darts, because his Humvee doesn’t mention the Second Amendment or Charlton Heston. I suppose a few enemy combatants have to be kept alive for questioning.

The homeland can never be too secure, and lately I’ve been thinking it couldn’t hurt for us to have one more person who’s trained and duly empowered to patrol our block, to keep an eye out for any unsavory or suspicious characters. So tomorrow I'll head down to city hall and see about getting myself a permit. I imagine the background check is fairly exhaustive, but I’ve never been to Afghanistan or Iraq or France or any of those other dicey places, and I don’t think they are constitutionally permitted to hold it against me that I went to a liberalarts college. I’m not sure what sort of prerequisites they havefor official terrorist hunters, other than an unflagging love of Freedom and a set of wheels to stick the permit on, but if I pass muster you can be sure the honor will be mentioned prominently on my resume, which I intend to circulate widely just as soon as the economy picks up.

And I really should get one of those yellow ribbon magnets to make it clear which side I’m on. Everybody knows that when al-Qaida is scouting locations to start a new cell, they pick a neighborhood that fails to conspicuously Support Our Troops.

Yes, by golly, it’s a good feeling, knowing that a guy can run down to the corner store for a six-pack and a can of bean dip without having to worry about suicide bombers or anthrax in the water supply, because the terrorist hunters are on the job.

Just checking in

Sunday's concert at the church was a moderate success. The crowd was small, but it was a paying gig and we raised a little dough for the Katrina relief effort. I donated $50 of my performance fee. If I find out how much else was raised through the church's bake sale, etc., I'll post the figure on my blog in case anyone is curious.

Now, onto other matters. I'm working on a couple of longish essays for one of my courses at Albany, and I hope to have them complete and up on the blog in a few days. One is about disciplining unruly children; the other is about my hometown's "cultural identity." (Don't snicker, it has one.) Stay tuned.

To keep you occupied, I'll direct your attention to the Web site of a poet/performance artist who has written an excellent piece of work on the condition of his own hometown, New Orleans. Check it out here: Chris Chandler Homepage He's a tragicomic genius.

Wednesday, September 14, 2005

Gig poster

I thought I'd throw this up on the blog in case any of my local readers are feeling ambitious enough to print out some posters and help publicize the concert I'll be doing on Sunday. (See last entry or the poster for details.)

I decided to donate all of my share of the free-will offering proceeds to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. The church will be throwing in money from a bake sale that will take place before, during (?) and after the concert. Please show up hungry and generous.

Friday, September 9, 2005

Upcoming gig in Fulton County

Just a reminder to all my hordes of screaming fans: I'll be playing next Sunday, Sept. 18, at St. James Lutheran Church on North Main Street in Gloversville. The show will be the first in the church's Fall 2005 concert series. It will start at 3 p.m., and I'll probably play two sets of 40 minutes apiece. There will be some sort of meet-Smokin' Bill tea-and-biscuits reception afterward.

I've been thinking about certain songs I could play in the context of the Hurricane Katrina relief effort that's so prominent in the public eye right now. I have ruled out "Do You Know What it Means to Miss New Orleans?" even though I love that song. It won't do it because A) it has too many fancy jazz chords for me to learn in a week, and B) I'm sick of seeing Harry Connick Jr. et al perform it ad naseaum on TV. (Do I get a Scrabble bonus for using two Latinisms in one sentence?)

The tunes I am leaning toward adding to my repertoire in light of the disaster are "Biloxi," a simple but beautiful reflective song by Jesse Winchester, and "Deep Blue Sea," a traditional folk song about losing a loved one to drowning and hoping for his eventual return in the sweet by and by. Feel free to suggest others by posting a comment here or sending them to me at smokinbill@aol.com.

Also note I've made some small changes to my music Web site, Smokin' Bill's Digital Depot, including some new .mp3 files. Mostly I just made a few visual changes.

 

Tuesday, September 6, 2005

Readin', Writin' and Deconstructin' the Oppresive Framework of Western Civilization

The fall semester has started at UAlbany, and I'm already in the thick of my two courses: a non-fiction prose writing workshop and a seminar called "Literature and Empire."

The workshop, obviously, will entail a significant amount of writing on my part, and the other has a heavy load of reading, both novels and theory/criticism. (Last week I went to the campus bookstore and paid $130 for eight of the 11 books required for the course. The remaining three were not available yet, so now I suppose I'll have to spend another $130 on gasoline to make another trip to Albany once they're in stock. Seems that expensive lately ...)

At any rate, my coursework will certainly put a damper on my blog productivity, so I decided I'll post some of my writing from the non-fiction workshop here. The ravenous intellectual appetites of my devoted readers must be satiated at all costs.

So here's the first offering, a short essay that I fired off after the kids went to sleep (and revised slightly while they were watching Sesame Street):

                           The Ride to Port Antonio

   It was a remarkably well-behaved chicken. Plump and massive, it sat like a glossy-feathered black Buddha in the lap of its owner and watched me with one unblinking eye. The bird neither clucked nor fussed, content to be stroked occasionally by the old woman as we sat side by side on the crowded bus that would take 10 hours to reach the other side of Jamaica.

   I'd picked a bad weekend to visit friends on the North Coast. Mudslides from a recent tropical storm had made a mess of the main road across the mountains, so buses traveling from the south had to take the coastal route around St. Thomas Parish on the eastern tip of the island. From where I was staying, in May Pen, the trip to Port Antonio would have taken half the time if the road hadn't washed out. But I was an 18-year-old exchange student on a break from school, and there was nothing better to do than spend a day on a cramped, hot bus beside a woman with bloodshot eyes, a toothless smile and a very big chicken.

   It was 7 a.m. on a Friday when I left the house and walked down the dirt track and over the bridge into downtown May Pen, pausing to let a small but slightly menacing herd of goats trot across my path. I caught a mostly full bus to Kingston: Mostly full is better than empty, because the buses don't roll until the seats and every square inch of standing room are filled with passengers. Choose a seat on a mostly empty bus, and you're liable to wait an hour for it to start moving. A person in a hurry can always pick a bus that appears to be filled to capacity, or even jump onto one that has begun to move. The greedy thugs who wrangle passengers and collect the fares are always able to find room for one more, even if it means pulling a rider in through a window in a tangle of sweaty limbs. 

   That particular morning, I was lucky to get one of the last open seats on a bus that was filling up fast, as the ones bound for the capital usually do. It headed out of May Pen, past the bank and the post office, past the drugstore and the Kentucky Fried Chicken and on its way to Spanish Town and then Kingston. I got off at the chaotic  terminal near Trench Town, a desperate, flyblown section of the capital where a few months later I would witness a riot - from the safety of another bus -  whose purpose I never learned, but whose burning tires and screaming participants are indelibly etched into my memory. 

   The terminal was a slightly more peaceful place the day I jumped off the bus from May Pen and quickly spotted one headed around the big bend to Port Antonio. This vehicle, a baby-blue former school bus,  was nearly empty, so I grabbed a seat and settled in for some downtime. A man reached in through the open window next to my head and, like an angel of vice, promptly sold me a pack of Craven 'A' cigarettes and a surprisingly cold Red Stripe.

   The latter, combined with the long wait and the oppressive heat, must have lulled me to sleep, because when I awoke, the bus was bumping along a pot-holed stretch of country road. Sunlight was winking off the dirty pastel squares of houses and the corrugated metal roofs of the ramshackle rum shops.

   And to my left was the chicken.

   There's nothing so surreal, in my experience, as  waking up on a moving bus in a foreign country and being startled by the cold gaze of an animal less than a yard from your face. After a moment of shock, I looked up to see the face of the person carrying this strange cargo. Her smile was wide enough to reveal discolored gums, and her tongue clicked with amusement. I said hello, and she nodded and mumbled something I couldn't make out. 

   We sat together for what seemed an eternity, but there was no conversation. When the bus reached Port Antonio, and the passengers started to stir, I realized with some alarm that my legs had both gone totally numb from the long hours in a seated position. The chicken lady must have sensed my problem, because she sprang up from her seat with the chicken under one stringy arm and helped me stand with the other.
I thanked her as we climbed down off the bus, and she nodded, mumbling again.

   She carried her bird off toward the waterfront, and I stumbled up the hill toward the Bonnyview Hotel, shaking pins and needles out of my legs. 

Saturday, September 3, 2005

Ouch, that smarts!

I read with some amusement that rapper Kanye West went to town during a live telethon on NBC tonight. He ripped the government's response to the situation in New Orleans, and said "George Bush doesn't care about black people." You've got to love live television.

At any rate, one of the things he said that struck me as being unfounded was the last part of this remark:

"We already realized a lot of the people that could help are at war right now, fighting another way, and they've given them permission to go down and shoot us."

This made me scratch my head. I hadn't heard about any government troops being given permission to shoot anyone. I figured perhaps West was overblowing the National Guard's attempt to get the looting and general chaos under control. Then I stumbled upon this item on the Army Times Web site, which uses remarkably bellicose language to describe what's supposed to be a relief operation:

http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-1077495.php

They describe the situation in the Big Easy as an "insurgency!" With relief like that, who needs hurricanes?

Thursday, September 1, 2005

Gas Pains

I saw today that the price of a gallon of regular 87 octane at the Stewart's was $3.59, 40 cents more that it was the day before, and about a buck more than it was a week ago. I thought the price of gas was bad enough a year ago, when I wrote my song "Workin' Down the Line." Here's an excerpt:

Gas is so expensive it hurts to fill the tank/

While the Arabs and the Texans are laughing to the bank/

It's draining the economy, it's messing up the skies/

But we need a way to get to work, so it's time we should get wise/

There's got to be a better way to make our engines run/

We could switch to hydrogen or power from the sun/

So tell those politicians we want alternatives to gas/

Because we're sick and tired of paying out the ..."